AEC and Pandemic: Response and Impact - September 2020 Update
Research initiative
The COVID-19 pandemic is bringing considerable changes to AEC’s business-as- usual. The primary research objective is to monitor and analyze AEC stakeholders’ response to the pandemic and develop lessons-learned guidelines for a “new normal” afterwards. The research will not only identify and analyze the quantified and qualified short- & long-term impacts and trends, and provide insights, but also build a shared platform to share information for CIFE members to more smoothly adjust to the new normal and be better prepared for future crises.
Categorization of the observed issues & Trend analysis
Given our observation of countless project-specific challenges and the response of the industry, we grouped the issues into 12 overlapping topics. The categorization and the trends will be analyzed monthly and updated as the industry focus changes.
In September 2020 the impacts of the pandemic continue to be the most important discussion topics in the industry, although climate change and social justice are becoming more popular. The communication about the pandemic has “watered-down”; there are substantially less pandemic-only webinars and articles, but almost every publication mentions an aspect of the pandemic. The industry has been adept to adapt no matter continuously changing and increasing challenges. The intensity of the pandemic impacts remains on the same level as over the summer. We are all in a wait-and-see mode, still optimistic but cautious and wait for the vaccine rollout. September data shows the AEC industry rebounding globally, more than any other industry. The dilution of pandemic-focused publications signals the start of permanent change. Some COVID-19 induced changes will stay permanently, while some restrictions will be lifted once the global population is vaccinated. Many uncertainties remain, and the experts predict waves of economic disruptions throughout the next decade affecting AEC as well.
Our September trend analysis is based on the selected 513 references (out of 561 analyzed September publications). The trends of the categories are provided in the table and the diagram below.
The categorization of the observed issues in September remained the same as in previous three months, including 12 categories and 22 subcategories.
1. (Advance) planning: short- & long-term strategies
- Discussion about this category is at its lowest level since April and we don’t expect this topic ever to reach the number one position from June 2020; All three subcategories decreased their presence from the August levels.
- Sustainability/ Green future – opportunity to address climate change is taking the lead among the three subcategories due to climate change disastrous events.
- Now is the time to reenergize or reset organizations with resilience and trust continuing to be the most important words of 2020.
4. Health and Safety (H&S)
- H&S has been discussed 20% less in September than in August in line with the overall trend of communication decrease; we know more about the virus and wait for the vaccine and pandemic fatigue. The September discussion focused on symptoms, vaccine race, drugs, flu season, screening and testing strategies, masks, adequacy of specific COVID-19 response and measures, etc.
- The U.S. contractors continue to report OSHA issuing citations to the companies failing to follow COVID-19 official guidelines.
- Mental health crisis deepens; anxiety and depression due to quarantine, unemployment rates, and uncertainties in general.
7. Buildings & cities for a next normal
- In September the volume of the discussion about this category dropped 44% in comparison to August.
- The community continues to discuss future of the workplace and the office, and its repurpose post-COVID; WFH offices; distribution center and warehouse design; justice, equity, diversity and inclusion; infrastructure projects and green future; educational post-COVID buildings; affordable housing; healthcare facilities that weathered COVID well; future of (healthy smart) cities; the digital technologies that can help return trust in spaces and places, etc.
- As expected, many architectural competitions for post-pandemic reality are published. Architects continue to envision and discuss memorials for coronavirus victims.
10. Official Strategies / Guidelines // Rules / Regulations
- Discussion about this category decreased 54% in September.
- Previously mentioned the first-ever published WELL certification for buildings to address a post COVID-19 environment is showing successful application in buildings. In previous reports we highlighted RESET® and Fitwel certifications.
- New building operation standards are required as the current guidelines are confusing and/or contradicting and unsustainable; in September the AEC community continues to urge action on healthier policy priorities in a more organized way.
AEC and Pandemic: Response and Impact - All Updates
April 2020 PDF • May 2020 Update PDF References
June 2020 Update PDF References • July 2020 Update PDF References
August 2020 Update PDF References • September 2020 Update PDF References
December 2020 Update PDF References • March 2021 Update PDF References
June 2021 Update PDF References
Research Team
Lead Researcher: Natasa Mrazovic
Prinicipal Investigator: Martin Fischer
Website: Junwen Zheng, Marc Ramsey, Andrew Peterman
Comments or Questions: cife-aec-pandemic-research@stanford.edu