Skip to content Skip to navigation

Quantitative Method for Analyzing Engineering Defect Risks in Novel Projects

TitleQuantitative Method for Analyzing Engineering Defect Risks in Novel Projects
Publication TypeWorking Paper
Year of Publication2009
AuthorsChachere, J
IssueWP119
Date Published04/2009
PublisherCIFE
Publication Languageeng
KeywordsCenter for Integrated Facility Engineering, CIFE, MACDADI, Stanford University
AbstractThis paper describes an initial application of Multi-Attribute Collective Decision Analysis for a Design Initiative (MACDADI) on the feasibility study of a mixed-use facility. First, observations of the difficulties the design team experienced communicating their goals, preferences, options, and analyses are presented. Next, the paper describes a formal intervention by the authors, integrating survey, interview, and analytic methods. The project team collected, synthesized, and hierarchically organized their goals; stakeholdersí established their relative preferences with respect to these goals; the design team formally rated the design options with respect to the goals; the project team then visualized and assessed the goals, options, preferences, and analyses to assist in a transparent and formal decision making process. A discussion of some of the strengths and weaknesses of the MACDADI process is presented and opportunities for future improvement are identified.
URLhttps://purl.stanford.edu/qh238bh8552
PDF Linkhttps://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:qh238bh8552/WP119.pdf
Citation Key704